Type: Concept / Protocol Reference
Editorial status: Working
Epistemic status: Operational
Evidence scope: Project sources and page-specific references; cross-links do not supply independent corroboration
Last reviewed: 2026-09-16 — AI-assisted editorial check
Human reviewed: Human content-review pending for this revision
Pyragogy uses two closely related ideas.
The Knowledge Diff is the formal CIP-KGE artifact.
It is structured, bounded, traceable to a specific session, and designed for human review.
It answers:
What exactly is being proposed, and what evidence supports this proposal?
A Knowledge Patch is the broader editorial idea of a local, inspectable change to the map.
It answers:
If this proposal is accepted, what small part of the map changes?
The useful mental model is:
Large synthesis is seductive.
A model can take one interview and rewrite an entire framework into a coherent story.
That coherence may be precisely the problem.
Locality forces the system to expose:
This makes revision easier to challenge and easier to reverse.
When several sessions support related changes, the sessions remain separate at the evidence layer.
Aggregation is a human interpretive act.
The system should not hide it behind an automatic “consensus” summary.
Evidence & Revision · Knowledge System · Handbook map · Home