Type: Research Experiment
Editorial status: Pilot
Epistemic status: Exploratory
Evidence scope: Interview-derived evidence under CIP-KGE
Last reviewed: 2026-09-16 — AI-assisted editorial check
Human reviewed: Human content-review pending for this revision
Most interviews end as content.
A recording is published.
A transcript is archived.
A summary is written.
Pyragogy Interviews asks for a different output:
What changed in the map because of this conversation?
The purpose is not to generate a polished conversation.
The purpose is to surface knowledge that can be challenged.
The AI Research Teammate enters the conversation with a relevant part of the current map.
It asks for:
The conversation can produce:
Nothing enters the map automatically.
The human review gate remains.
The argument for using AI is not that AI is inherently a better interviewer.
It is that an AI system can be connected to the existing knowledge map and can systematically ask:
The system still has to earn the answer.
Every conversation should be capable of ending with:
What changed in the map because of this conversation?
Sometimes the answer should be:
Nothing yet. We learned what still needs evidence.
That is a valid research outcome.
Evidence & Revision · Knowledge System · Handbook map · Home